<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1" ?>
                        <rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
                            <channel>
                                <atom:link href="http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/blog.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
                                <title>Caitlin Woodward</title>
                                <link>http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/</link>
                                <description></description>
                                <language>en-us</language>
                                <copyright></copyright>
                                <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:00:00 CST</pubDate>
                                <generator>RocketFuel CMS</generator>
                                <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
                                <item>
                                    <title>Super Prime Phone Number</title>
                                    <link>http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/super-prime-phone-number/</link>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<div class="rf-paragraph"><p>At work, we were designing some new business cards for me (more on that later!), when I decided that I wanted to put my mobile number on there, but not my actual cell phone number. So I decided that I was going to try and start using a Google Voice local number to forward to my cell, that way I can see which number is being called. Anyway. So the trick now is, <em>what phone number to pick?</em></p><p>I can't just pick a number. It has to have something cool about it.  </p></div><div class="rf-paragraph"><p>The obvious 314.159.2653 was taken. So was 271.828.1828. That's okay, though, I wanted a 901 area code anyway. I was also a little sad to discover that area codes started at 201, which completely ruined my ability to get a binary phone number. Then I could tell people, "Oh yeah, my phone number is 153". It would've been great. Then I got the idea that maybe I could do something in octal (or hex, and just tweak it so that it didn't use a-f). I played around with options for a while, and gave up on that idea also. I finally decided that prime numbers were cool.</p></div><div class="rf-paragraph"><p>(I don't know the names for the anatomy of a phone number, so use xxx.yyy.zzzz as a reference.) </p><p>I knew I wanted an area code of 901, so I wanted to find a prime number between 9010000000 and 9020000000. Alright, cool. I looked around at Google Voice numbers, and found some the most common yyy's. For Midtown, they were 213, 214, and 257; among some others scattered, but I figured these would work well enough.</p></div><div class="rf-paragraph"><p>I wrote a script to find me all the primes between 9012130000 and 9012150000 (I changed these to search for yyy = 257 in a different run). It only took a few seconds and found quite a bit. Cool, but then I had to pick one. I decided that there needed to be more uniqueness to it, then just the whole number being a prime. </p><p>So I modified the script to find me all the prime numbers in that boundary where xxx.yyy.zzzz AND yyy.zzzz AND zzzz were all primes. And it found me less than 30. All that was left was to pick one that looked cool and flowed well when spoken. The one I picked had only one even numbered digit, sadly there was no phone number in 901 that was completely odd numbered digits. But I was happy.</p></div><div class="rf-paragraph"><p>And that's the story behind my super prime phone number.</p></div>]]></description>
                                    
                                    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:00:00 CST</pubDate>
                                    <guid>http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/super-prime-phone-number/</guid>
                                </item>
                                <item>
                                    <title>The Dvorak Experience</title>
                                    <link>http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/the-dvorak-experience/</link>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<div class="rf-paragraph"><p><img src="http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/site_files/images/Mobile_Photo_Oct_4_2009_8_41_59_PM-thumb5.jpg" alt="" class="" style="width: 418px; "></p></div><div class="rf-paragraph"><p>Most of my readers probably already know a little bit about the Dvorak keyboard layout. If not, I highly recommend the web comic zine, <span class="fakelink" href="http://dvzine.org/zine/01-toc.html" target="_blank">The Dvorak Zine</span>. It goes through the history of the keyboard, why we have QWERTY, and the benefits of the Dvorak layout. </p><p>I don't even remember how I found out about the Dvorak keyboard layout. I don't even remember the real reason I wanted to switch. I had a pretty awesome typing speed on QWERTY. I think I just read so many good things about it that I wanted to try it. It took me a few tries to finally switch over. I don't even remember <em>when</em> I first started. </p></div><div class="rf-paragraph"><p>The first time I tried to change over, I don't think that I even switched my keys around. I just tried to learn by touch typing. It went pretty well. I went through some <span class="fakelink" href="http://gigliwood.com/abcd/lessons/" target="_blank">typing lessons specially designed for Dvorak</span>. I only made it throught the home row lessons plus a couple more. It was weird how natural it felt from the beginning. I remember typing classes in high school, and the first half of it was horrible. "ffff jjjj fjfj fjfj ffjj ffjj". The early Dvorak lessons were similar, but very quickly you were typing real words. This was because all the vowels were on the home row, along with the most common constanants. </p><p>I ignored advice that said once you decide to learn Dvorak, don't switch back and forth between the two layouts until you fully learn Dvorak. Well, deadlines at work and school were pushing, so I switched back to QWERTY, and didn't switch back. </p></div><div class="rf-paragraph"><p>Months passed. Lots of me telling myself I was going to switch back over. Even Scout was pestering me, "When are you going to switch back to Dvorak?" One time I even rearranged the keys on an external keyboard at work and would use that every so often. That didn't last long.</p><p>Last summer, I decided that I was going to rearrange the keys on my Macbook, and I wouldn't switch back until I had reached my old typing speeds. So I rearranged my keys one afternoon. It was interesting, because for some silly reason, and this is kind of hard to explain, the F and the J on my keyboard were printed sideways, and because of this, the key connectors were also sideways, so that the letters would look correct. As a result, when I rearranged my keys, the F and and the J were both sideways on their new spots, because the key connectors were the regular way. And, the keys that took the old F and J spots were also sideways, because they were regular keys and the key connectors were not. </p></div><div class="rf-paragraph"><p><img src="http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/site_files/images/canvas-thumb5.png" alt="" class="" style="width: 418px; "></p></div><div class="rf-paragraph"><p>As a side story, for some reason, I went into the Apple Store (we were in Seattle at the time) to talk to someone about this. I don't know, I thought maybe I could get a couple new keys printed, Apple can be weird and cool like that sometimes. Walked in, found someone that seemed pretty competent, and I told him that I had a really strange problem. He kind of took this as a challenge and replied, "Try me." So I took my MacBook out and described the issue. He just kind of looked at me blank-faced, "Uhh..." and all he coud suggest was to find some keyboard covers.</p><p>Anyway, so this time I lasted about a week. I was definitely improving, but it still took so much to do stuff. I liked typing in Dvorak, but as soon as I had to write a somewhat lengthy e-mail, it felt like it was going to take forever to write. Popped out my keys and rearranged them back. </p></div><div class="rf-paragraph"><p>Lots of time passed. More of me telling myself I was going to learn Dvorak. I guess it took until about early spring of this year to switch again. I rearranged my keys, and told myself that this was it. I <em>was not</em> going to switch back to QWERTY this time. Third time's a charm. And I did it. It's crazy, because as soon as I made the mental switch back to Dvorak, it was like I had never stopped. Within ten minutes, I was right back to where I left off. And about a week and a half or so after that, I was right back up to my QWERTY speeds.</p><p>And I stuck with it. I had been typing it for a few months, when I started to think, "Hmm... my fingers don't <em>really</em> feel much better." All those Dvorak articles talked about how you had to move your fingers so much less. It wasn't until one day when I sat down at a computer and typed in QWERTY for an hour, and I started to think, "Wow. The keys are so far apart, I have to move my fingers so much," that I noticed that there really is a difference.</p><p>It's pretty easy for me to switch back and forth now. If I hop onto another person's computer, I can flip the mental switch and type in QWERTY just fine. Sometimes I like to give the analogy of driving a stick shift versus an automatic car. </p></div><div class="rf-paragraph"><p>In the end, I <em>love</em> typing in Dvorak. It's kind of difficult to explain why. It just feels good I guess. Natural. Not to mention the geek points you get from it.</p></div>]]></description>
                                    
                                    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:00:00 CDT</pubDate>
                                    <guid>http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/the-dvorak-experience/</guid>
                                </item>
                                <item>
                                    <title>The Old AIM Warn Wars</title>
                                    <link>http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/the-old-aim-warn-wars/</link>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<div class="rf-paragraph"><p>The other day at the office, Andy decided he would spam Lisa since she actually signed onto AIM. There was a full minute or maybe more of alternating keys from Andy's desk (the trick is hold Cmd down, and alternate between V and shift). This minute included Lisa's "Are you serious?!" look, also. The menubar and dock icon slowly counted along with all the messages she was getting. 319 was the final count. </p><p>This all reminded me of back in the old AIM days, where we actually used AOL Instant Messenger to communicate, and not some multi-protocol application. This kind of behavior would not stand. The application would actually prevent you from sending a lot of messages crazy fast like that. After about 10 or 20 or so of quick consectutive messages, it would give you an alert to wait several seconds. </p></div><div class="rf-paragraph"><p>But that was not the best part. The best part about the old AIM days was the Warn feature. This was originally intended for inappropriate IMs. Once a chat had been initiated, you had the ability to warn them. Each warning increased the warning level of a user. The warning level was displayed by a percentage next to the screename of that person on everyone's buddy list (meaning everyone who added that user as a friend). As your warning level increased, you slowly start to lose some functionality of AIM. After a while, the rate that you can send messages gets reduced. Eventually, if it got high enough, the user would even get kicked offline for a period of time.</p><p>So emerged warn wars. This usually took place between two people. For some reason or another, if one was annoyed or trying to be silly, or out of complete boredom, he or she would start warning the other as fast as possible. As your warning level went up, you would start to lose the ability to warn as fast. It was pretty much a battle of who could do it the fastest. Sometimes a group of people would gang up on one, and that's how the best usually fell. Win or lose, though, it was almost always kind of thrilling. </p></div><div class="rf-paragraph"><p>It was always entertaining as a bystander. I remember sitting there with my buddy list open, and all of the sudden, one of my buddies goes from no warning to 97% to signing off in matter of 10 seconds. "Ope, there went Peter..."</p><p>Ah, how things were back then. </p></div>]]></description>
                                    
                                    <pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 12:00:00 CDT</pubDate>
                                    <guid>http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/the-old-aim-warn-wars/</guid>
                                </item>
                                <item>
                                    <title>In A Subpixel Font</title>
                                    <link>http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/in-a-subpixel-font/</link>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<div class="rf-paragraph"><img src="http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/site_files/images/caitlinwoodward-thumb3.gif" alt="Caitlinwoodward" class="right "><p>The other day I was surfing the web, and found a blog post on <span class="fakelink" href="http://typophile.com/node/61920" target="_blank">a handmade subpixel type family</span>. This particular font has a x-height of 3 pixels, which means the letter "x" is 3px tall. </p><p>I had heard about subpixels before, but I didn't really know much about them. And subpixels are what make this tiny font actually work. It's how a lowercase "a" can look different than a lowercase "o" in a 3x3 pixel square.<span class="fakelink" href="http://www.grc.com/ctwhat.htm" target="_blank"></span></p><p><span class="fakelink" href="http://www.grc.com/ctwhat.htm" target="_blank">This is the long version about how a subpixel works.</span> But basically (how I understand it), every single pixel (at least on LCDs) is comprised of three subpixels, R G B. By coloring the full pixel with a specific color, it will activate one or two or three of the subpixels, and trick the human eye into only seeing party  of it. </p><span class="fakelink" href="http://www.grc.com/ctwhat.htm" target="_blank"></span><p>So the first thing I did after I finished my research? I spelled out my name. Without the padding, the image is 58x5 pixels, and 166 bytes. Cool. </p><div class="clear"></div></div>]]></description>
                                    
                                    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 12:00:00 CDT</pubDate>
                                    <guid>http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/in-a-subpixel-font/</guid>
                                </item>
                                <item>
                                    <title>I Love Memphis</title>
                                    <link>http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/i-love-memphis/</link>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<div class="rf-paragraph"><p><img src="http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/site_files/images/Photo_on_20090901_at_1801_2-thumb5.jpg" alt="" class="" style="width: 418px; "></p></div><div class="rf-paragraph"><p><em>Around RocketFuel, we use index cards. </em></p><p>This was a picture that I submitted to <span class="fakelink" href="http://ilovememphisblog.com/" target="_blank">Kerry</span>'s <span class="fakelink" href="http://www.flickr.com/groups/1171565@N25/pool/" target="_blank">Flickr Pool</span>.</p></div>]]></description>
                                    
                                    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 12:00:00 CDT</pubDate>
                                    <guid>http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/i-love-memphis/</guid>
                                </item>
                                <item>
                                    <title>My First Stylesheet</title>
                                    <link>http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/my-first-stylesheet/</link>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<div class="rf-paragraph"><p>I was digging in the <span class="fakelink" href="http://www.archive.org/web/web.php" target="_blank">wayback machine</span> and was surprised to find various versions of my old website, which managed to survive my adolescence. Sadly, I couldn't find any of my pre-teen sites, but those were more Pokémon fan sites and stuff than a personal website or blog anyway; oh, and they were built in WYSIWYG anyway. (<span class="fakelink" href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/23/yahoo-quietly-pulls-the-plug-on-geocities/" target="_blank">RIP Geocities</span>.)</p><p>So I found my favorite design of my old personal site. The one that managed to stay around the longest. It was the first one I had designed myself, and I think I had a hard time letting it go. It was strong and simple; you can already see my minimalistic style. I think I continued to make small tweaks over the times. Maybe I'll revisit it...</p><p>I also found my very first stylesheet, that I created when I was 15 (with some help from Dad). Ignore the teenage angst with the declarations for "#kiss". </p></div><div class="rf-paragraph"><p>body {<br />	 	 	 	background: black;<br />	 	 	 	color: #000000;<br />	 	 	 	margin: 0;<br />	 	 	 	padding: 0;<br />	 	 	 	}</p><p>a:link          {color: #000000; text-decoration: none;}<br />a:visited       {color: #000000; text-decoration: none;}<br />a:hover         {color: #FFFFFF; background: #000000; text-decoration: none;}<br />a:active        {color: #FFFFFF; background: #000000; text-decoration: none;}<br /><br />#content {<br />	 	 	 	margin: 15px 5% 15px 45%;<br />	 	 	 	padding: 0;<br />	 	 	 	border: 1px solid black;<br />	 	 	 	background: white;<br />	 	 	 	color: black;<br />	 	 	 	font: normal normal 11px verdana,sans-serif;<br />	 	 	 	}<br /><br />#cat, #genta, #kiss {<br />	 	 	 	position: absolute;<br />	 	 	 	width: 102px;<br />	 	 	 	height: 102px;<br />	 	 	 	right: 60%;<br />	 	 	 	border: 1px solid white;<br /> 	 	 		}<br /><br />body>#cat, #genta, #kiss {<br />	 	 	 	position: fixed; /* fix ie win problems */<br />	 	 	 	}<br /><br />#cat {<br />	 	 	 	bottom: 15px;<br />	 	 	 	}<br />	<br />#genta {<br />	 	 	 	bottom: 132px;<br />	 	 	 	}<br />	<br />#kiss {<br />	 	 	 	bottom: 249px;<br /> 	 	 		}<br />		<br />#tow {<br />	 	 	 	position: absolute;<br />	 	 	 	width: 200px;<br />	 	 	 	height: 60px;<br />	 	 	 	left: 15px;<br />	 	 	 	top: 15px;<br />	 	 	 	border: 0px;<br /> 	 	 		}<br />	<br />body>#tow {<br />	 	 	 	position: fixed; /* fix ie win problems */<br />	 	 	 	}<br /><br />p {margin: 1em 5%;}</p></div>]]></description>
                                    
                                    <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 12:00:00 CDT</pubDate>
                                    <guid>http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/my-first-stylesheet/</guid>
                                </item>
                                <item>
                                    <title>My Workspace: A Web Developer's Perspective</title>
                                    <link>http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/my-workspace/</link>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<div class="rf-paragraph"> <p>Lately I have been interested in improving my workflow. I've spent the past month or so trying new ways of doing things in hopes of making my workflow a little better. Not much luck. I can't even find a good blog article for tips. </p><p>So I thought I would share my workspace with you.</p> 					 				 		 <p>I use my MacBook as my primary monitor, and a Dell 24" monitor as a second monitor. In addition, I also use three vertical spaces in Leopard's Spaces. Below is the setup that I usually start my day with.</p><p>I have my Textmate (code) on full screen in my main monitor, visible in Space 2. On my second monitor, I always have my chat (essential), browser (work and play), and a Finder window. The bottom left corner varies. Sometimes it's Firefox's download manager, a video, terminal, etc; whatever fits. I usually have Terminal open with <span class="fakelink" href="http://docs.blacktree.com/visor/visor" target="_blank">Visor</span>, for quick (and neat) access with a hotkey. I used to have Firefox take up the full external monitor, but after a while realized I could use the space more efficiently. Everything on the left monitor is set to be visible on all spaces.</p></div><div class="rf-paragraph"><p><img src="http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/site_files/images/desktops-thumb5.jpg" alt="" class="noborder" style="width: 426px; "></p></div><div class="rf-paragraph"><p>In Space 3 on my main screen, I have all my image editing software, mostly set to show Photoshop and Illustrator. Below is a screenshot of what that setup looks like.</p></div><div class="rf-paragraph"><p><img src="http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/site_files/images/desktops2_1-thumb5.jpg" alt="" class="noborder" style="width: 426px; "></p></div><div class="rf-paragraph">I use Space 1 for other random things. This includes VMWare, for browser testing, or Mail for email, or Sequel Pro for database management, or whatever else.<p>I used to have an FTP client also open in a space. I quit using a true FTP client because ExpanDrive integrated FTP into Finder. You can notice in the screenshots in Finder's far left pane that there are a couple red drives. Those are my active FTP connection. I can navigate the directories with Finder. If you are someone who needs to be able to see invisible files, then use TinkerTool to show them. Also, ExpanDrive works wonders with Textmate. I can just drag a folder into Texmate, and it automatically creates a project. And voila, you are working live and it is so seamless. You can see an example of this in my first screenshot. </p><p>Having the code and the browser side by side is nice because I can see changes by just looking to the left screen (and refreshing). A live preview would by nice, but I haven't found one that works well with PHP. I haven't looked very hard, though. Refreshing hasn't gotten in the way yet either, so. </p><p>If I need to reference or cut up some images from the PSD or AI file, I can just switch to the next space (for me, ctrl+down, alt-tab once or twice depending on how recently I've used the app, or I've even programmed a couple mouse buttons for switching spaces that will work). This gives me a side by side view of the browser and the design, and I can easily start to figure out the next step of my implementation.</p> 					 				 		 <p>Now that I have shared mine, I am interested to learn about <em>your</em> workspace, even if you are not a web developer. I think that my workflow and productivity could be improved, but I don't know how.</p></div>]]></description>
                                    
                                    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:00:00 CDT</pubDate>
                                    <guid>http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/my-workspace/</guid>
                                </item>
                                <item>
                                    <title>Color Preference</title>
                                    <link>http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/color-preference/</link>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<div class="rf-paragraph"><p>I am sitting here working on my site, when I randomly decide to pull up the color information with the web dev toolbar.</p></div><div class="rf-paragraph"><p><img src="http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/site_files/images/Picture_3-thumb5.jpg" alt="" class="noborder" style="width: 426px; "></p></div><div class="rf-paragraph"><p>And I'm thinking <em>My, that's a lot of shades of grey</em>. So I decided to condense them, you know, clean up the color palette a bit (I can pretend to be a designer sometimes by using the jargon). </p> <p>I asked Scout, sitting next to me, out of pure sillyness, "Which grey do you prefer? #acacac or #b5b5b5?" </p> <p>Her response was thirty seconds of silence followed by, "... I don't really have a preference." </p> <p>As a side note, my site does not have that many greys anymore. </p> </div>]]></description>
                                    
                                    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:00:00 CST</pubDate>
                                    <guid>http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/color-preference/</guid>
                                </item>
                                <item>
                                    <title>Firefox Keywords</title>
                                    <link>http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/firefox-keywords/</link>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<div class="rf-paragraph"><p>How often do you find yourself going to google.com to do a search? Going to amazon.com to look for a product? Some suggest using the little search box in the top right of most browser, but personally that search box annoys me. Why not make use of the URL bar? </p><p>One of my favorite features of Firefox has always been the keyword search. This allows you to add a keyword to a certain search and perform search with that keyboard inside of the URL bar. Now, anytime I want to google something, I simply type in "gg whatever" in my URL bar. Say I want to look up a YouTube video, I then type in "yt video". </p><p>In early versions, it was complicated, but the newer versions build it right into the bookmarks and contextual menus. I will demonstrate this for a regular Google search, but this will work on most search fields. </p><p><strong>Step 1: Add a keyword for this Search. </strong>Go to the search engine that you want to add a custom keyword for. Right click on a text input box for a search field. Select "Add a Keyword for this Search." </p></div><div class="rf-paragraph"><p><img src="http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/site_files/images/Picture_7-thumb5.jpg" alt="" class="noborder" style="width: 426px; "></p></div><div class="rf-paragraph"><p><strong>Step 2: Add the bookmark. </strong>In the keyword field, add a short keyword for your search. You can name it whatever you want and save the bookmark wherever you want. I like to store mine in Unsorted Bookmarks, that way I don't see it in my bookmarks menu. Also, for my google search, I just use "gg". I don't know why, but that's what my dad used when he taught me how to do this a long time ago.<br /> </p></div><div class="rf-paragraph"><p><img src="http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/site_files/images/Picture_8-thumb5.jpg" alt="" class="noborder" style=""></p></div><div class="rf-paragraph"><p><strong>Step 3: You're done!</strong> It's that simple. Now, to use it, just go to your URL bar and type in your keyword plus your search term.</p></div><div class="rf-paragraph"><p><img src="http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/site_files/images/Picture_9-thumb5.jpg" alt="" class="noborder" style=""></p></div><div class="rf-paragraph"><p>I have these set up for all kinds of tools that I use. Google Image - (gi), Amazon (am), IMDB (imdb), Twitter Search (twit), YouTube (yt). The possibilities are endless.</p></div>]]></description>
                                    
                                    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:00:00 CST</pubDate>
                                    <guid>http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/firefox-keywords/</guid>
                                </item>
                                <item>
                                    <title>Scribble Scribble</title>
                                    <link>http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/scribble-scribble/</link>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<div class="rf-paragraph"><p><img src="http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/site_files/images/M414L36B-thumb5.jpg" alt="" class="noborder" style=""></p></div><div class="rf-paragraph"><p>How to read, for:<strong></strong></p><p><strong>Math majors: </strong>0 ≤<em> </em>xi minus eta ≤ B sub n minus A sub n < episilon<strong></strong></p><p><strong>Non-math majors: </strong><strong> </strong>0 ≤<em> </em>scribble minus scribble ≤ B scribble minus A scribble < E</p></div>]]></description>
                                    
                                    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 12:00:00 CST</pubDate>
                                    <guid>http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/scribble-scribble/</guid>
                                </item>
                                <item>
                                    <title>Twitter Filters: The Missing Feature</title>
                                    <link>http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/twitter-filters/</link>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<div class="rf-paragraph"><p>Twitter is great. We all love twitter. It's simple, and that's what is great about it. It does not have a lot of features, but that is usually fixed by a third party app. There is one major feature, however, that I feel is missing and would have to be implemented by Twitter themselves. Filters.<br /><br />Currently you have two privacy options, public and locked. If your setting is public, anyone can read your tweets. If it is locked, then that means only the people that follow you can see your tweets. I think that there needs to be more levels that are custom. What if I don't want the people at work to read details about my weekend out, but I still want to tweet to the rest of my friends about stuff? What if I want to complain about my boyfriend to my twitter friends, but I don't want him to see? Or even, I would like to create a Memphis filter, so all of my out of town friends don't have to get spammed with tweets about Memphis; they don't care about where we're meeting for lunch. I would also like to create a "tech filter", so I don't have to bother my non web developer friends about helping me with a CSS bug.<br /><br />And LiveJournal, one of our very first social networks, has had this feature since its birth.<br /><br />In your settings, you'd be able to create groups. It'd be very simple, it would show you a list of everyone you are following, and you could pick and choose who goes into your group. Here's a screenshot of how you can currently manage groups from the LiveJournal backend. It's even very primitive as far as look and javascript-y goodness goes.</p></div><div class="rf-paragraph"><p><img src="http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/site_files/images/Picture_1-thumb5.jpg" alt="" class="" style="width: 418px; "></p></div><div class="rf-paragraph"><p>On the web interface, Twitter could put a little icon next to the update button, that allows you choose a specific filter for that tweet. Or, for the people who text, you would have to be able to assign each of your groups a short code. Obviously, there would be some reserved codes, for example 'd', which is already used for direct messaging. But I could assign my Memphis group the short code 'm', work would be 'w', all the girls would be 'g', web developers would 'wd', I could go on.<br /> <br /> And the same thing goes for reading, too. At least in the web interface. There would be a tab on the right titled "Groups" or something, where I could go and read a twitter feed for a specific group. It would make it so much easier to assign who I get text updates from. Instead of going to about fifteen different pages, I could just go into my settings, and tell it that I would like to receive text updates from my close friends filter.</p><p>Filters would give the people to opportunity to tweet more, since they don't feel like they have to be reserved because there is that one person out there who might read it. It would allow people to follow more people, since they know that they could filter those people that they don't want to read.</p><p>I think the world would be a little friendlier with Twitter filters. </p></div>]]></description>
                                    
                                    <pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 12:00:00 CST</pubDate>
                                    <guid>http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/twitter-filters/</guid>
                                </item>
                                <item>
                                    <title>One Word</title>
                                    <link>http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/one-word/</link>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<div class="rf-paragraph"><p>"What's your login name?"</p><p>"Caitlin Woodward."</p><p>"One word?"</p><p>"WOOD-WARD... oh, yes." </p></div>]]></description>
                                    
                                    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 12:00:00 CST</pubDate>
                                    <guid>http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/one-word/</guid>
                                </item>
                                <item>
                                    <title>A Christmas Story</title>
                                    <link>http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/a-christmas-story/</link>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<div class="rf-paragraph"><p>I don't remember where I got this, but I find it in my documents every now and again. It's my favorite Christmas joke:</p><p><em>This is the time of year when we think back to the very first Christmas, when the Three Wise Men; Gaspar, Balthazar and Herb, went to see the baby Jesus and, according to the Book of Matthew, "presented unto Him gifts; gold, frankincense, and myrrh."<br /><br />These are simple words, but if we analyze them carefully, we discover an important, yet often overlooked, theological fact: There is no mention of wrapping paper.<br /><br />If there had been wrapping paper, Matthew would have said so:<br />"And lo, the gifts were inside 600 square cubits of paper. And the paper was festooned with pictures of Frosty the Snowman. And Joseph was going to throweth it away, but Mary saideth unto him, she saideth, 'Holdeth it! That is nice paper! Saveth it for next year!' And Joseph did rolleth his eyeballs. And the baby Jesus was more interested in the paper than the frankincense."</em></p></div>]]></description>
                                    
                                    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 12:00:00 CST</pubDate>
                                    <guid>http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/a-christmas-story/</guid>
                                </item>
                                <item>
                                    <title>10-2-4</title>
                                    <link>http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/10-2-4/</link>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<div class="rf-paragraph"><p>"What's with that clock? 2, 4, 10?"<br />"Um, those old Dr. Pepper ads? You haven't seen those? My grandparents used to have that clock."<br />"What does it mean?"<br />"I don't know. It was just some ad campaign they did."<br />"Oh. I was starting to think, oh, well, I thought it was some math thing to add up to 42. 4*10+2. 42 flavors, right?"<br />"No, I think it's 32."<br />"Oh. Well, then. (4+2)/2*10+2."<br /><br />Upon writing this, I realized that it's actually <em>23</em> flavors, not 32. So, 10*2+(4+2)/2. On a side note, my dad always wondered if the number 23 conspiracy theorists drank Dr. Pepper. Also, I looked up what it means, for those who are curious:</p><p><em>They represent the times of day when the human body needs a little “pick-me-up” to avoid an energy slump. It was in the 1920s that Dr. Walter Eddy at Columbia University studied the body’s metabolism. He discovered that a natural drop in energy occurs about 10:30 a.m., 2:30 p.m. and 4:30 p.m. But he also discovered that if the people in his research study had something to eat or drink at 10, 2 and 4, the energy slump could be avoided.</em></p></div>]]></description>
                                    
                                    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 12:00:00 CDT</pubDate>
                                    <guid>http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/10-2-4/</guid>
                                </item>
                                <item>
                                    <title>Life Defining</title>
                                    <link>http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/life-defining/</link>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<div class="rf-paragraph"><p>Some of my life-defining moments:</p><ul><li>Doing pages of math work, praying for no little mistakes, and getting the answer correct!</li><li>Completing math proofs</li><li>Building a full website without crossbrowser testing, and it only having minimal errors in IE</li><li>Receiving hugs from my brothers, my sister, my mom, and my dad</li><li>Making <span class="fakelink" href="/site_files/images/Picture_2_233956-thumb5.png">her</span> happy</li></ul></div>]]></description>
                                    
                                    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 12:00:00 CDT</pubDate>
                                    <guid>http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/life-defining/</guid>
                                </item>
                                <item>
                                    <title>Complex Cartesian</title>
                                    <link>http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/complex-cartesian/</link>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<div class="rf-paragraph"><p>My Complex Analysis book reads, <em>It is presumed that the reader is familiar with the Cartesian coordinate system.</em><br /><br />...why would you be taking Complex Analysis if you weren't?</p></div>]]></description>
                                    
                                    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 12:00:00 CDT</pubDate>
                                    <guid>http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/complex-cartesian/</guid>
                                </item>
                                <item>
                                    <title>SublimI'mAwesominal</title>
                                    <link>http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/sublimimawesominal/</link>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<div class="rf-paragraph"><p><img src="http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/site_files/images/Photo_40-thumb5.jpg" alt="" class="" style="width: 418px; "></p></div>]]></description>
                                    
                                    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 12:00:00 CDT</pubDate>
                                    <guid>http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/sublimimawesominal/</guid>
                                </item>
                                <item>
                                    <title>Erd&Atilde;&para;s-Ko-Rado</title>
                                    <link>http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/erdos-ko-rado/</link>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<div class="rf-paragraph"><p>Following my <span class="fakelink" href="/blog/math-narcissism/">previous post</span>, Erdös quickly became my favorite mathematician. One, he specialized in graph theory, currently my favorite branch of math. And two, the Erdös number thing was just too cool.<br /> <br /> I remember when I was in grade school, my dad's classroom at the school he taught at had a computer lab in it. He named all the computers in there after famous mathematicians. I remember walking around and reading the names, wondering who they were and why there were so famous. I can remember the first three computers in the lab were named Archimedes, Euclid, and Bernoulli, in that order. I remember that he didn't have Einstein. I always wondered why there wasn't an Einstein, since when you are a kid, that's the first person you think of when you think of mathematician. I understand now, though.<br /> <br /> When I got my new MacBook a few months ago, I needed a new name for it. I never really had a naming scheme for my tech devices, and I needed one. I always thought my dad's naming scheme was cool, but never really considered it, since I never felt attached to any given mathematician. Until now. So the decision to name my laptop was easy. I named it "Erdös". (Cool. Now any device that directly interacts my computer has an Erdös number 1.)<br /> <br /> Last night I decided to install Windows XP on my computer using Boot Camp. I created a partition on my hard drive, and I needed to name it. I have grown weary of using Windoze; it was just kind of getting old. So I did some research to find some mathematicians that Erdös published with. In no time, I found out about this theorem named the <span class="fakelink" href="http://%5c%22http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erd%C5%91s%E2%80%93Ko%E2%80%93Rado_theorem%5C%22">Erdös-Ko-Rado Theorem</span>. It's a hypergraph theorem that Erdös co-published with two mathematicians named Ko and Rado. Perfect. I named my Windows partition "Ko". Then I renamed my iPhone to "Rado". Awesome.</p></div>]]></description>
                                    
                                    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 12:00:00 CDT</pubDate>
                                    <guid>http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/erdos-ko-rado/</guid>
                                </item>
                                <item>
                                    <title>Math Narcissism</title>
                                    <link>http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/math-narcissism/</link>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<div class="rf-paragraph"><p>A couple years ago, I learned about this thing called the <span class="fakelink" href="http://%5c%22http//genealogy.math.ndsu.nodak.edu/%5C%22">Mathematics Genealogy Project</span>. It's a math family tree based on mathematicians who have earned their PhD. A mathematician's parent is their PhD advisor. It's very neat how few links it takes to link one of your own math professors to famous mathematicians. Only four links up, one of my professors is linked to <span class="fakelink" href="http://%5c%22http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Neumann%5C%22">Neumann</span> and <span class="fakelink" href="http://%5c%22http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Felix_Klein%5C%22">Klein</span>. Anyone heard of the <span class="fakelink" href="http://%5c%22http//www.google.com/images?hl=en&q=klein+bottle&btnG=Search+Images%5C%22">klein bottles</span>? Following Klein up, you have <span class="fakelink" href="http://%5c%22http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rudolf_Lipschitz%5C%22">Lipschitz</span>. And then <span class="fakelink" href="http://%5c%22http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_ohm%5C%22">Martin Ohm</span>, the little brother of <span class="fakelink" href="http://%5c%22http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georg_Ohm%5C%22">Georg Ohm</span>, of which Ohm's Law is named after. Another fun thing to do is see how close of cousins two randomly picked math professors are. Another math professor of mine is five links away from Klein, also. They are math fifth cousins. </p><p>On a similar note, there was this mathematican named <span class="fakelink" href="http://%5c%22http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Erd%C5%91s%5C%22">Paul Erdös</span>. He was one of those who didn't really live anywhere, but traveled around everywhere. He stayed at fellow mathematicians' houses for months at a time. During his stays, he would work on a math problem with that friend until they solved it. He would publish a paper on that particular problem with his friend, and then move on to the next friend. As a result, he published a ton of papers, around 1,500 with over 500 colloborators. This thing emerged in the math world known as the Erdös number. If you published a paper with Erdös himself, then you had an Erdös number 1. If you published a paper with someone who published a paper with Erdös, then you had a number 2. And so on. This idea was so cool to me. My undergraduate advisor is an Erdös number 2. If only I could publish a paper with him, I would have an Erdös number 3. And that would just be the coolest thing ever. </p><p> One time in a class, one of my professors was talking about this, the math genealogy tree and Erdös numbers. He asked us why we thought that mathematicians did these things. This sort of ranking in the math world. I answered because mathematicians are a little egotistical. I picked the wrong word, because the class ooh-ed, and that's not what I intended. I mean, I'm the same way. A friend of mine saved me with the word narcissistic. Mathematicians are extremely proud of their accomplishments. Narcissistic, even.</p></div>]]></description>
                                    
                                    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 12:00:00 CDT</pubDate>
                                    <guid>http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/math-narcissism/</guid>
                                </item>
                                <item>
                                    <title>Changing Sides</title>
                                    <link>http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/changing-sides/</link>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<div class="rf-paragraph"><p>"Wanna try to partition your hard drive again?"<br />"Nah, we can do it in Seattle."<br />"Your backup is here, though. If it messes up, you will have to wait to get your files back."<br />"I know. Yeah... I might need some of them."<br />"Like what?"<br />"Some of my research documents, and..."<br />"Well my dad can just email them to you."<br />"Yeah, you're right."<br />"I like how we totally just switched sides of this discussion."</p></div>]]></description>
                                    
                                    <pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 12:00:00 CDT</pubDate>
                                    <guid>http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/changing-sides/</guid>
                                </item>
                                <item>
                                    <title>Roman Numeral Clocks</title>
                                    <link>http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/roman-numeral-clocks/</link>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<div class="rf-paragraph"><p>I have developed a recent obsession with analog clocks. Not just any analog clock, but one with roman numeral numbers.</p> 							 				<p>Take a look at these two clocks. Notice anything unusual?</p></div><div class="rf-paragraph"><p><img src="http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/site_files/images/clocks1-thumb5.jpg" alt="" class="noborder" style="width: 426px; "></p></div><div class="rf-paragraph"><p>Try this one.</p></div><div class="rf-paragraph"><p><img src="http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/site_files/images/ph8852-thumb5.jpg" alt="" class="noborder" style=""></p></div><div class="rf-paragraph"><p>This all started when I was walking across campus with a friend, when he said to me, “Caitlin. Have you ever wondered why analog clocks with roman numerals have IIII for the number four instead of IV?” I was immediately dumbfounded. How could I have noticed that before? Immediately I began looking at all the clocks we passed by. Didn’t really find any roman numeral clocks, but then I remembered that Google Images existed. I looked it up, and sure enough, most of the roman numeral clocks used IIII.<br /><br />But why? It made little sense to me. The nine was most still an IX on all of them. I started research. I found no definite answers, but there are several theories. The most common is that it is for the aesthetic value of the clock, since the IIII balances with the VIII on the other side. This makes sense, but I still was not convinced.<br /><br />The one that seems most logical to me involves the casting process of actually making the numerals. Using IV makes the count of numerals 17 I’s, 3 V’s, and 2 X’s, where as using IIII, the count is changed to 20 I’s, 4 V’s, 4 X’s. The latter is obviously easier for casting numerals evenly.<br /><br />Another theory that I just recently found was that, in Roman times, IV was an abbreviation for the Roman god Jupiter. The people decided that they did not want to clocks to read “1, 2, 3, Jupiter, 5…”<br /><br />I still find the whole topic intriguing. Makes me want to buy an analog clock with IIII on it.</p></div>]]></description>
                                    
                                    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 12:00:00 CDT</pubDate>
                                    <guid>http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/roman-numeral-clocks/</guid>
                                </item>
                                <item>
                                    <title>Look Between</title>
                                    <link>http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/look-between/</link>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<div class="rf-paragraph"><p><img src="http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/site_files/images/Picture_2_233956-thumb5.png" alt="" class="" style="width: 418px; "></p></div>]]></description>
                                    
                                    <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 12:00:00 CDT</pubDate>
                                    <guid>http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/look-between/</guid>
                                </item>
                                <item>
                                    <title>Credit Cards</title>
                                    <link>http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/credit-cards/</link>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<div class="rf-paragraph"><p>Today at work, Andy was complaining about the company business card (that was actually designed by guys who work here) and how it was hard to read the numbers. I told him that he is supposed to feel the numbers. He laughed.<br /><br />That made me wonder if they made credit cards in braille. Turns out some credit card companies actually make them in large print and braille.<br /><br />Then I thought it would be funny if I could get my credit card in binary, or hex.<br /><br />Decimal:<br />5412-3456-7890-1234<br /><br />Full binary:<br />10011001110100111111111101101100101111010111111110010<br /><br />Binary broken up into four sets of 4 decimal:<br />1010100100100-110110000000-1111011010010-10011010010<br /><br />Full hex:<br />133a7fed97aff2<br /><br />Hex broken up into four sets of 4 decimals:<br />1524-0d80-1ed2-04d2</p></div>]]></description>
                                    
                                    <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 12:00:00 CDT</pubDate>
                                    <guid>http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/credit-cards/</guid>
                                </item>
                                <item>
                                    <title>Elevator Interrogation</title>
                                    <link>http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/elevator-interrogation/</link>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<div class="rf-paragraph"><p>The other day, I was headed to work, riding up the elevator in my office building. A white-haired business man got in the elevator with me. You could tell he was high in ranks by the quality of his suit, but he also a natural smile about him, no doubt had a couple of grandchildren.<br /><br />I pushed the "6" button, and he didn't push anything. Apparently he was going there too. It was silent for the first three floors. Then he said, "Who you going to see?" Already I was thrown off by the phrasing. After an unnecessary pause of confusion, since it made me look like I had to think (this is the same pause when someone asks me how old I am), I replied, "RocketFuel."<br /><br />He looked at me. "Does your daddy work there?"<br /><br />Oh. Right. This hadn't happened in a long time. "No."<br /><br />"Your mommy?"<br /><br />"Um. No."<br /><br />He looked at me.<br /><br />"I work there."<br /><br />Then he did this weird jump backwards, like he had been startled. "How old are you?!"<br /><br />Turns out he works at what my office calls the "Last Name Company." It's actually a company name compromising of five last names.</p></div>]]></description>
                                    
                                    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:00:00 CDT</pubDate>
                                    <guid>http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/elevator-interrogation/</guid>
                                </item>
                                <item>
                                    <title>Caitlin's Approval</title>
                                    <link>http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/caitlins-approval/</link>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<div class="rf-paragraph"><p><strong>Mom: </strong>Go get Caitlin's approval.</p><p><strong>Conlan, walking over: </strong>Where's your approval?</p><strong></strong></div>]]></description>
                                    
                                    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 12:00:00 CST</pubDate>
                                    <guid>http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/caitlins-approval/</guid>
                                </item>
                                <item>
                                    <title>The Bird and ER Scenarios</title>
                                    <link>http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/the-bird-and-er-scenarios/</link>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<div class="rf-paragraph"><p>A bird almost flew into the side of my face today. I was walking out of an open doorway on the school campus, and this huge black bird swiped down and inches in front of me. Had I been a few seconds faster or it had been a few seconds slower, it would have flown directly into the side of my face. Now, don't get me wrong, I am very glad it didn't hit me. But looking at it from the other perspective, it wouldn't have been too bad if it did. It would be interesting, and funny (definitely more retrospectively, but I imagine there would be plenty of humor at the time). Immediately I envisioned just this huge hole shaped gash on my forehead or on my cheek. People would ask what happened, and I would reply nonchalantly that a bird flew into me. I mean, how often does that happen?<br /><br />Or, I could see myself in the emergency room. Somehow the bird managed to lodge its beak into the side of my face, and it was too deep that I thought I shouldn't take it out myself.Â  So I would be sitting there in the waiting room, you know for three hours of course. People would be coming in with gun wounds and missing limbs, and I would be sitting there with a bird sticking out of side of my head. It would be kind of funny.<br /><br />Oh, wow. I just realized that the bird would probably be still alive for all of this. Provided that it didn't pass out from shock or anything, the new image would be of me, sitting in the waiting room, with a bird stuck into the side of my head and flapping around like mad. Would it stop trying to flap after a couple hours? What would happen if it dislodged itself in the waiting room? I could picture that too. Two hours have already passed. I'm lying down in the waiting room chairs because I have a headache now since the bird has been flapping, well, because there is a beak lodged into the side of my head. So I'm lying there. The bird is lying on the side of my face. The bird is tired because it's been flapping for hours. Every ten minutes or so the bird flaps around sort of lazily, but to no avail. But finally, the bird manages to get free, and starts to fly away. I shoot up in immense pain because the bird just dislodged itself and now there is blood spurting out of my head Kill- Bill-style. Meanwhile, the bird used up all its energy flapping, so it can't really fly. It falls to the ground and just kind of flaps around the ground like a fish. So. That might not be as funny.<br /><br />Perhaps, after all, I am thankful for those two seconds that didn't bring us together.</p></div>]]></description>
                                    
                                    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:00:00 CST</pubDate>
                                    <guid>http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/the-bird-and-er-scenarios/</guid>
                                </item>
                                <item>
                                    <title>Poop Invariant</title>
                                    <link>http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/poop-invariant/</link>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<div class="rf-paragraph"><img src="http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/site_files/images/loop-thumb3.gif" alt="Loop" class="right noborder"><p>My algorithms professor writes the lowercase letter "l" with loops. Because of this, whenever he writes the word loop, it actually looks like "Poop". See picture (I apologize for my paint-like version; it wasn't worth the trouble of writing and scanning).</p><p>Now, I don't know why I hadn't noticed this before. I've had him for another programming class before, where we have talked extensively about loops.<br /> <br /> So in class on Friday, he was talking about loop invariants. And, on the board, he wrote the words "loop invariant", with a rather large loop on the l, and it stood out bright, "poop invariant" was written on the board. I was immediately amused, but shortly forgot about it. About twenty minutes later, Teddy, sitting next to me, leaned over and whispered, "That looks like poop invariant." I replied with a bit of excitement, at the fact that someone else noticed, "I know!" And then for some reason I couldn't stop thinking about it. My professor, in the middle of lecturing, turned around and looked at me, noticing that I had a grin on my face - which only made me grin more. I saw him pause his words slightly, with a hint of a smile reflecting my grin, and almost stopping to question, but he continued on with his lecture.<br /> <br /> If he had asked, I would have told him without hesitation about what I found so funny. Which I think would have made the situation even more funnier: the only girl, in a class of college boys, pointing out such testosteronic humor. <br /> </p><div class="clear"></div></div>]]></description>
                                    
                                    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:00:00 CST</pubDate>
                                    <guid>http://www.caitlinwoodward.me/poop-invariant/</guid>
                                </item>
                            </channel>
                        </rss>