Caitlin Woodward
Twitter Filters: The Missing Feature
Twitter is great. We all love twitter. It's simple, and that's what is great about it. It does not have a lot of features, but that is usually fixed by a third party app. There is one major feature, however, that I feel is missing and would have to be implemented by Twitter themselves. Filters.
Currently you have two privacy options, public and locked. If your setting is public, anyone can read your tweets. If it is locked, then that means only the people that follow you can see your tweets. I think that there needs to be more levels that are custom. What if I don't want the people at work to read details about my weekend out, but I still want to tweet to the rest of my friends about stuff? What if I want to complain about my boyfriend to my twitter friends, but I don't want him to see? Or even, I would like to create a Memphis filter, so all of my out of town friends don't have to get spammed with tweets about Memphis; they don't care about where we're meeting for lunch. I would also like to create a "tech filter", so I don't have to bother my non web developer friends about helping me with a CSS bug.
And LiveJournal, one of our very first social networks, has had this feature since its birth.
In your settings, you'd be able to create groups. It'd be very simple, it would show you a list of everyone you are following, and you could pick and choose who goes into your group. Here's a screenshot of how you can currently manage groups from the LiveJournal backend. It's even very primitive as far as look and javascript-y goodness goes.
![]()
On the web interface, Twitter could put a little icon next to the update button, that allows you choose a specific filter for that tweet. Or, for the people who text, you would have to be able to assign each of your groups a short code. Obviously, there would be some reserved codes, for example 'd', which is already used for direct messaging. But I could assign my Memphis group the short code 'm', work would be 'w', all the girls would be 'g', web developers would 'wd', I could go on.
And the same thing goes for reading, too. At least in the web interface. There would be a tab on the right titled "Groups" or something, where I could go and read a twitter feed for a specific group. It would make it so much easier to assign who I get text updates from. Instead of going to about fifteen different pages, I could just go into my settings, and tell it that I would like to receive text updates from my close friends filter.
Filters would give the people to opportunity to tweet more, since they don't feel like they have to be reserved because there is that one person out there who might read it. It would allow people to follow more people, since they know that they could filter those people that they don't want to read.
I think the world would be a little friendlier with Twitter filters.

Lindsey
Totally agree. Every detail is awesome. I wish you could sell this idea to Twitter for tons of money.
Caitlin
I don't really care about money (okay, maybe it would be kind of cool). I just want this to get dugg and implemented.
Jonathan
I like the idea. This could feed twitters income too. Say this is made a feature of a premium account for $15 a year. Then they would finally have some business model :)
Ryan
I like the idea however it seems a bit complicated for me. I would probably use this however for it to go mainstream I think it needs a simple twist. I believe Tweetdeck offers some sort of functionality like this except in reverse. You only see what you want to see and lump people into categories.
Caitlin
Ryan, that's the beauty of these extra features. You don't -have- to use them. You can go public, or private. Or, if you want, you can take advantage of the filter feature.
scout
Twitter filters would be great. I would pay a fee for that. Oh, and haha. Your boyfriend.
Skippytpe
Love idea of directing tweets to just a small group (which is kinda tweetdeck in reverse). Once you've built your groups LJ style, it seems like the simplest implementation on the Twitter side to be something like "g @groupname" to address a particular group? I could be dead wrong but it just seems that this way would cause less of an upheaval in the developer ecosystem as everybody scrambled to catch up (@s are already pretty well handled)... Just my $.02... like I say, love the idea :)
alexis
YESSS!! People should always pay attention to you, Caitlin. This is exactly what I have been wanting for Twitter. Most of the time I just want to look at my friends' tweets, and a lot of the time I'd like to filter out those peripheral acquaintances who tweet every time they shift gears.
Leave a comment